Click here to download the full PDF version of the EPA's Portland Harbor Proposed Plan. It is 151 pages, 23MB. Additional information and details can be found at http://go.usa.gov/3Wf2B
The Plan is currently being reviewed by multiple organizations and individuals. As we have more material available, we will post that here. Click here to see an initial list of concerns raised by Dr. Peter deFur, technical consultant working with the Portland Harbor Community Advisory Group and Willamette Riverkeepers.
Go to this site to make comments to EPA. Write your own comments in your own words highlighting what you feel are the most important points to raise. Be specific when you can.
Diverse coalition condemns EPA’s Portland Harbor cleanup plan Group urges action at cleanPDXharbor.orgSubmitted by CAGAdmin on Tue, 06/28/2016 - 09:34
Portland, OR— A coalition of diverse community groups held a press conference Friday to condemn the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) plan to clean up the Portland Harbor Superfund site. The plan, proposed on June 8th, would leave 92 percent of the 11-mile stretch of the Willamette River toxic to people and wildlife indefinitely.
As reported by OPB:
Chevron, Gunderson, NW Natural, Union Pacific Railroad, Evraz Inc., Arkema and TOC Holdings Co. filed a legal dispute with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
As reported in the Portland Tribune by Bianca Pahl:
The Portland Harbor Community Advisory Group held a public forum Tuesday night at Hariet Tubman Middle School to provide a better understanding for the community about the Environmental Protection Agency’s Superfund plan to decontaminate certain areas of the Willamette River.
Dr. Peter deFur, technical consultant providing review of the Superfund Proposed Plan for the Portland Harbor Community Advisory Group, at a public forum on Tuesday, June 21st, presented what he sees as issues for the community to pay particular attention to, in our review and for comments to the EPA. Attached is the PowerPoint presentation from Dr. deFur.
Issues of concern in the initial ESC analysis of FS and Proposed Plan, including elements from the 2015 Proposed Plan. 6-21-2016
By Dirk VanderHart in the Portland Mercury:
Article by Stephen Quirke published in Street Roots:
The Willamette waterfront is many things to many people – a place to sleep, a food source, a wildlife habitat, a place to swim and for others, a place to dump industrial waste.
An Oregonian report from 1906 called the river a “common sewer for the entire valley,” and after a state official reported typhoid germs in the river that year, the Oregonian suggested that readers should “cultivate the gentle art of keeping their mouths closed while in the water.” In 1885, the city of Portland formed a committee to find water less polluted by sewers and pulp and paper mills, and by 1895 the first water from Bull Run was flowing into the city.
The Portland City Council today passed the first reading of an agreement to ensure that the city-owned Swan Island boat ramp continues providing service to recreational boaters. The agreement transfers ownership of the boat ramp from the Bureau of Environmental Services to Portland Parks & Recreation (PP&R).
The US EPA Released the following statement, with the Proposed Plan for Cleanup of the Portland Harbor:
Proposed EPA Cleanup Plan will make Portland Harbor safer and healthier for all